Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The threat of hacking is one of the main problem areas facing lawyers who are finding themselves under growing pressure to tighten their systems. A half of IT security problems are estimated to be linked to poor design, according to the Center for Secure Design, a wing of the IT professionals body, the IEEE Computer Society. The particular problem comes with apps whose basic design can be faulty and not up to current standards. Updates might fix the failings in a superficial way but often do not correct the underlying weakness.
Vendors v buyers
Dan Geer, chief information security officer at an arm of the Central Intelligence Agency in the US, is one who has called for legal accountability to be pushed towards the designers. He works at the venture capital wing of the Agency, In-Q-Tel. Rolf von Ressing of Isaca, a global association of IT security professionals, said: 'Software vendors bring these products into the world with all their vulnerabilities, but it’s the companies that buy them that are left dealing with the consequences.' This debate could have very significant effects on the development of the software industry and the way that law firms and other buyers of their services protect themselves. Source: FT
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]