Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
‘The right to exclude competitors from using one’s property rights is important’, wrote Judge Kimberly Moore, adding that, ‘the right to maintain exclusivity — a hallmark and crucial guarantee of patent rights deriving from the constitution itself — is likewise important.’ Judge Sharon Prost disagreed, saying that, ‘Apple failed to offer any defensible evidence on consumers’ willingness to pay even a nominal premium for the patented features over non-infringing alternatives.’ That dissent may give hope to Samsung that it can win an appeal in a higher court. If it does not, it may have to tweak the software even in recent devices by the end of the year. Source: Financial Times
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]
