Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Property developer Paddy McKillen, represented by Herbert Smith Freehills, claimed that he was treated unfairly over business dealings regarding the Berkeley, the Connaught and Claridge's, the Telegraph reports.
The allegations against Sir David and Sir Frederick were thrown out for the first time in August and again by three Appeal Court judges yesterday who refused Mr McKillen permission to take the case to the Supreme Court.
'Will fight on'
Following two years of legal procedures, Mr McKillen’s legal bill amounts to £20m. As reported by the Telegraph, Mr McKillen was cited saying ‘I am disappointed but will continue to fight on’. The billionaire brothers denied misconduct and claimed that the allegations were damaging the Barclay name, according to the report. Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay were represented by Weil Gotshal & Manges and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]