Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The representative body of barristers in England and Wales yesterday criticised the decision of the bar associations of Saket and Delhi not to represent the men charged with the fatal gang rape of a 23-year-old student last month.
Horrendous crime
In a statement, the Bar Council acknowledged the ‘horrendous’ nature of the crime, but added: ‘The presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial are fundamental human rights, and cornerstones of democracy. Effective legal representation is a central component of a fair trial.’
The council said it has confidence in the Indian bar and its associations to respect the rule of law and ‘reflect those values’ by representing the accused ‘without fear or favour’.
Effective representation
Alex Bailin QC, who is based at London chambers Matrix, agreed, telling The Lawyer newspaper that the Indian bar’s current boycott was ‘completely wrong’. He continued:
‘Whatever the strength of evidence, everyone facing a criminal charge needs effective legal representation -- all the more so when the crimes are this serious.’
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]