Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
According to a BBC report, the oil giant claimed that the lawyer administering the compensation fund is misinterpreting the terms of the agreement and making payouts that are too generous.
Compensation
The company agreed last year to pay compensation to around 100,000 people and companies who claimed the 2010 spill harmed their livelihoods or health.
However, BP claims to have discovered that some companies who made claims were based far from the coast and were given compensation despite records showing their profits had increased in the year of the spill.
According to the report, BP highlighted a $21m payout to a Louisiana rice mill 40 miles inland and $9.7m payment to an Alabama construction company nearly 200 miles from the sea.
Reality
In the filing to a New Orleans court, BP said: ‘BP did not agree to pay what is already hundreds of millions of dollars, and potentially billions, to claimants with 'losses' that do not exist in reality.’
Lawyers representing the claimants responded by accusing BP of undervaluing the settlement and underestimating the number of people and business who meet the claim criteria which BP had agreed to.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]