Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The warrants had been used to seize documents and computer files from the homes and offices of the Tchenguizs in what has become a highly controversial case.
Heavily criticised
The SFO’s conduct – pursuing its largest case in almost 10 years – was heavily criticised by two of Britain’s most senior judges in a lengthy review, according to The Guardian newspaper. The office had already dropped Vincent as a suspect after conceding its suspicions were based on errors, but it pushed ahead with the inquiry against Robert despite warnings from the court.
Sir John Thomas and Mr Justice Silber said the judge who granted the order was ‘given an account that was not only wholly inadequate, but unfair’.
Robert Tchenguiz said he and his family had ‘suffered enormous damage, not least to my reputation’. He added that he intends to seek damages against the SFO for his arrest last year.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]