Eight-to-eight is now seen as the norm spaxiax
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
At issue was a recording made by lawyers in Seattle-based Davis Wright Tremaine. But the acceptability of the recording was challenged on the grounds that it violated privacy laws. Washington has strong privacy laws which require the consent of all parties when conversations are recorded. Davis Wright sought to argue that there were special circumstances if a recording took place in the course of gathering evidence for a law case. But the court would not accept this stance, saying that the recording was not 'protected activity simply because it is undertaken during the course of a lawsuit'. Source: KPLU News for Seattle and the Northwest
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]
Copyright 2024 © The Global Legal Post. All Rights Reserved
