Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Hennepin County District Judge Robert Blaeser decided the firm violated state rules of professional conduct after failing fully to disclose potential conflicts to 3M -- a previous client of Covington in an on-going environmental pollution action.
Judge Blaeser said the firm ‘exhibited a conscious disregard for its duties of confidentiality, candour, full disclosure and loyalty to 3M’ for its past representation of the company on ‘issues at the heart of the state's case,’ reports the Minnesota Star Tribune.
Contaminated water
The case involves the state's allegation that 3M - manufacturers of the Post-it note and Scotch Tape - contaminated river and groundwater sources through the release of perfluorochemicals (PFCs).
Dallas-based Bickel & Brewer -- the law firm representing 3M – labelled the judgment ‘a resounding victory’ for the multi-national conglomerate ‘that underscores the importance of the ethical duties that are owed by lawyers to their clients’.
Disagreement
In a statement to The Post, Timothy Hester -- chairman of Covington's management committee -- said: ‘The State of Minnesota has been a client of this firm on environmental matters since 1995. We respectfully disagree with the court's ruling. We believe 3M failed to identify an actual conflict of interest and its attempt to disqualify the firm should in any event be barred because it came 15 months after the case was filed.
3M is a former firm client and the State of Minnesota's current environmental case against 3M is not substantially related to a food packaging matter that we handled for 3M many years ago. Our client, the State of Minnesota, will be weighing its options, including an immediate appeal.’
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]