Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Mr Vasiljkovic is alleged to have tortured and slaughtered prisoners of war and civilians in Croatia between 1991 and 1993. The case has involved a seven-year Australian court battle, which culminated recently with the High Court overturning a lower decision not to extradite Mr Vasiljkovic on the grounds that he would not receive a fair trial in Croatia.
Imprisoned
The former commander is an Australian citizen, although he was born in Belgrade, and has been imprisoned since 2006. A decision to approve the extradition was made by the country’s home affairs minister, Jason Clare.
The accused has launched a judicial review challenge through his newly appointed legal representative, Mr Mori, who faces a difficult challenge, but also has wide scope for legal argument, according to Mr Vasiljkovic’s former barrister, Clive Evatt QC, who was quoted in a report in The Australian newspaper. The presence of Mr Mori has excited attention in the legal profession in the hope that it will increase the pace of legal challenges in similar cases.
Discretionary powers
The case throws a spotlight on the Australian government’s exercise of discretionary powers. Criminal barrister Greg Barns -- a member of the Australian Lawyers Alliance -- told the newspaper: ‘There’s been one-way traffic in war crimes cases in Australia for a long period of time.’
The alliance’s Tom Percy QC has put the pressure on ministers, claiming they are increasingly finding themselves ‘in an invidious position’. The courts, he says, are giving closer scrutiny to ministerial decision making. Recent years have seen successful challenges to decisions in wider areas involving immigration and asylum.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]