Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Court documents in the Excalibur v Gulf Keystone case show that George Panayides was seen as ‘a long-standing and trusted employee’ of the Lemos family. George’s brother Alex was a Clifford Chance partner advising Excalibur. He estimated that Excalibur’s £1b claim against Gulf Keystone over oil in Kurdistan had a 90% chance of success. The claim was a ‘once in a lifetime investment opportunity’, according to the firm. It appeared that Mr Lemos could win up to £320m if the verdict went the right way.
Polar opposite
But Lord Justice Christopher Clarke dismissed the Excalibur claim in the High Court, calling it ‘speculative and opportunistic’. Mr Lemos has had to pay costs. The judge said: ‘It is Mr Lemos’s misfortune that the advice he was so confidently given was the polar opposite of what I have decided.’ Source: The Telegraph
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]