Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
| 1yr
| 1yr
Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Through a range of recent US court rulings, companies from Russia, China, the Netherlands and India have had to produce documents because their in-house lawyers have not had a licence. Bank of China was recently required to produce information relating to an internal investigation when the judge involved, Shira Scheindlin, said that lawyer-client privilege was inapplicable.
Unknown in China
Lawyer Laniel Saperstein, who acts for Bank of China, said: 'The notion of US-style discovery is simply unknown in China and other civil law jurisdictions.' Source: ABA
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]