Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The ruling by Judge Lewis Kaplan of the Southern District of New York related to a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) suit in which Chevron alleges that an Ecuadorian court's $18 billion judgment against the company was obtained through fraud and extortion, reports Lexology.
Environmental destruction
The Ecuadorian case centres on whether oil giant Texaco caused environmental destruction in the country prior to its merger with Chevron in 2001.
Although Chevron argued that CEO Mr Watson and general counsel Mr Scott did not have unique personal knowledge on relevant topic, Judge Kaplan rejected all of their arguments.
Lexology suggests the case is a further warning that ‘even the most senior officers in a company, the CEO and general counsel, may be deposed if a court determines there is a possibility that such ‘apex officials’ have personal knowledge relevant to a legal dispute.’
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]