Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe is facing gross misconduct charges, reports South African newspaper Business Day, with the ongoing hearing before the Judicial Service Commission investigating allegations dating back four years. The postponement is part of a continuing saga involving allegations that Judge Hlophe attempted to influence judgments relating to corruption charges against President Jacob Zuma.
State funding
Although the committee initially cleared Judge Hlophe in 2009, the Supreme Court of Appeal overturned that decision. A hearing scheduled for last June was postponed because it did not have a quorum, reported the Cape Times newspaper.
Judge Hlophe has already been granted R7m (£550,000) of state funding to cover outstanding legal fees, but this has been insufficient, with at least R3.5m remaining unpaid. Judge Hlophe’s attorney, Barnabus Xulu, has also confirmed that his client has refused to agree to reimburse any costs if the commission finds against him.
Issue of fairness
Mr Xulu described the situation as ‘very, very, very bad’, not least because of a lack of clarity around payment of Judge Hlophe’s future legal costs. He continued that there would be ‘serious issues of fairness’ if Judge Hlophe was not represented.
This latest delay is another blow to the Judicial Conduct Committee, which has been criticised for its handling of the case. A recent Business Day article reported that the committee has received written submissions saying that the ‘only lawful course’ for the case is the establishment of a formal misconduct tribunal, including cross-examination, to reach a clear understanding of what happened.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]