Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
| 1yr
| 1yr
Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The contract between Proview and Grandall involved Grandall paying all legal costs up front in exchange for an immediate four per cent share of the settlement. Although Apple recently paid Proview $60 million, Grandall claims it has yet to receive its $2.4 million share.
Nonsense demands
Proview founder Yang Rongshan told Sina Tech (via engadget) that Grandall’s demands were ‘nonsense’, and that although they would pay in due course, Proview is not currently under ‘normal operations’ and so is not bound to fulfil the contract.
Proview used to manufacture LCD screens, but the company’s Shenzhen factory closed a few years ago. It is believed to have debts of up to $400 million, and was reportedly hoping for a billion-dollar settlement from Apple.
Grandall is not the only business seeking money from Proview. The company’s many creditors -- which include the Bank of China -- are also demanding payment. In March, Taiwan-based Fubon Insurance, another creditor, applied to declare Proview bankrupt to gain a share of its liquidated assets.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]