Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
London weekly newspaper, the Law Gazette, reports that Chief Ombudsman Adam Sampson is planning to publish data for the first quarter ‘sometime in the autumn’.
Imperfect
The Gazette reported that in his blog, Chief Ombudsman Adam Sampson revealed and explained the decision, which will see some 900 complaints -- regardless of their justification -- being published on the internet.
The ombudsman said the published data would comprise ‘pretty much all the useable information we possess’, with the exception of the identity of the complainant. This will include the name of the lawyers and firms involved, the date of decision, what the decision was, any remedy given, and the reason for the complaint.
Although the process was described by Mr Sampson as ‘imperfect’, he argued that it is the best solution, providing transparency and acting in accordance with the demands of the British government’s Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, which has called for the Legal Ombudsman to follow the example of the Financial Services Ombudsman in making information public.
Factual data
Mr Sampson explained that ‘given the choice between making an imperfect, transparent start or keeping information secret, our commitment to our values means that there really was only ever one answer’.
Anticipating allegations from the lawyers that the decision is ‘part of some campaign against the profession’, unfairly implementing the concept of ‘naming and shaming’, Mr Sampson clarified that ‘what we are publishing is factual data, not opinion’, and that the purpose of the policy is ‘merely one of transparency’.
The plans were scheduled to be implemented this month, but had to be postponed for discussions regarding the best way to present the data.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]