Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
| 1yr
| 1yr
Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
While the league urged a judge to dismiss the players’ claims, lawyers for the players fired back, accusing the NFL of exposing its employees to severe injury and concealing the risk of repeated head trauma.
Bargaining agreements
The players’ lawyers filed a brief on Wednesday in a US District Court in Philadelphia challenging the league’s claim that the case is a labour issue that should be settled through their own collective bargaining agreements. The brief was filed in response to the NFL’s motion to dismiss their claims filed back in August.
As the San Francisco Chronicle website reports, the players argue that the NFL knew of the risks of neurological injuries and failed to ‘implement equipment standards adapted for head trauma’ and cite a common-law duty to protect its employees.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]