Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The Ministry of Justice says the 1930-built site has issues with disabled access, security, cramped waiting areas and poor toilet facilities. It argues these would be better addressed in proposed alternative courts. Sara-Jayne Fildes, president of Chichester District Law Society, claims that other courts will not be able to cope with the volume of work transferred and suggests that the value of the city centre court site was a bigger factor behind the proposal than demand.
A ‘legal desert’
The court had a 78 per cent usage rate during 2014/5 and is the only Crown court in West Sussex, which has a population of over 800,000. Bill Emerson, of Chichester’s Pallant Chambers, said: ‘There will be no local justice or access to justice for a large proportion of the residents of West Sussex, creating a legal desert.’ Source: The Law Society Gazette
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]