Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
But a row continues to simmer between the country’s legal profession authorities and national politicians. MPs have questioned the credibility of the Malaysian Bar Council, voicing concerns over a proposal in the bill to give the ruling body power to issue licences to international practices.
The bill states that no foreign law firm can practise in Malaysia unless it is licensed, but it allows firms to practise via international partnerships. It also allows local practices to employ foreign lawyers under certain conditions.
Investment flow
According to The Star Online, a deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Liew Vui Keong, said the government decided to liberalise Malaysia’s legal sector in November 2008 as part of a bid to strengthen trade and investment flow into the country. ‘For the purpose of liberalisation, foreign law firms and lawyers will only be allowed to practise in peninsular Malaysia and will be governed by the Legal Profession Act,’ he said.
The Bill has gained cross-party support, with one MP, Khairy Jamaluddin, stating: ‘Liberalising the legal profession is a step towards the right direction with the government taking efforts to be more open in the economic, trade and investment sectors.’ Another MP, R Sivarasa said: ‘We see this as a move to boost the professionalism of players in the legal sector. This also has close links to the freedom of the judiciary.’
Conflicts of interest
However, according to Malaysian news agency Bernama some politicians maintain that the proposal to give the Bar Council power to issue licences is inappropriate as conflicts of interest would arise. Only last month, the council was heavily criticised for its role in rushing an extraordinary general meeting where it condemned police for alleged brutality at a rally. One leading minister, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein, stated the council had 'damaged its credibility and integrity' (see What’s New, 14 May).
Meanwhile, The Sun Daily reports that Mr Liew has moved to defend the creation of a Law Academy, stating that it is not aimed to compete with the bar council but to complement the development of the legal system.
‘The establishment and functions of the Bar Council are according to the Legal Profession Act 1976 and the government does not intend to abolish or amend any of its provisions. The Bar Council can still function as it is now,’ said Mr Liew.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]