Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Cook County Circuit Judge Kathy Flanagan said that there was ‘no basis’ for such a claim to be brought and criticised the law firm, Ribbeck Law, for filing similar petitions in the past. The law firm appears to have used a formula which should only be used when defendants are unknown - but it identified Boeing in this case.
Expectations
Ribbeck Law has said that it expects to represent families regarding more than half the people on board. But its court filing was made in relation to a Dr Januari Siregar, described as the father of a passenger. Instead, Dr Siregar appears to be an uncle of the passenger and he is also said to be acting without the agreement of the rest of the family.
Legal grey area
Robert Clifford of Clifford Law has acted for hundreds of air victims and their families over three decades and says: ‘These are the kind of lawsuits that make lawyers look bad -- and we already look bad enough.’ He is concerned that legal steps were made before the plane was found. Bruce Ottley, professor at DePaul University’s International Aviation Law Institute, says: ‘It seems to be a legal grey area when we are operating without the plane…It certainly gets them attention to be first. ... But when you file it before we even have verified that the passengers are dead, it may be a little bit early.’ Source: AviationPros.com and ABA
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]