Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
| 1yr
| 1yr
Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
The four-week jury trial in San Jose is set to test the intellectual property rights in the mobile device market, as Cupertino-based Apple seeks damages in excess of $2 billion from South Korean outfit Samsung , reports the Financial Times newspaper.
In the opening stages of the trial, Samsung – which supplies a significant amount of components for Apple – argued that it has not infringed on Apple’s patents. Charles Verhoeven of New York law firm Quinn Emanuel Urqhart & Sullivan said: ‘Samsung is not some copyist, some Johnnie-come-lately doing knock offs.’
Ad speak
Meanwhile, Apple’s legal team often sounded more like their advertising department. Harold McElhinny of San-Francisco founded firm Morrison & Foerster displayed a photo of the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs when he unveiled the iPhone in 2007. Mr Elhinny said: ‘It is hard to remember what ‘phones looked like before this conference.’
Mr Elhinny added: ‘Apple has a vision that technology should be about much more than simple functionality. It should be about the experience, how you react to the products.’
Mr Verhoeven responded: ‘There is nothing wrong with being inspired by someone else’s design… It’s called competition.’
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]