A PI and workers compensation firm is to be allowed to continue with advertisements on the side of buses Tupungato
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
Lundy Law was challenged by rival firm Larry Pitt & Associates which said that the contract was anti-competitive. But US District Judge Cynthia Rufe wrote in her judgement that the agreement did not violate anti-trust rules. She wrote: 'While Pitt alleges that it has received fewer workers’ compensation cases since losing the opportunity to advertise on the exterior of SEPTA buses, this allegation only demonstrates an injury to Pitt, and not to consumer choice or to competition for clients. As antitrust laws protect competition, not competitors, these allegations are insufficient.' Source: ABA Journal
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]
Copyright 2024 © The Global Legal Post. All Rights Reserved
