Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
However, those three and other similarly minded investors could face a long wait. Jacoby & Meyers has applied to federal courts in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to change state laws forbidding non-lawyers from owning interests in law firms. While the case was allowed to proceed in New Jersey – and is pending in Connecticut -- it was thrown out by a New York judge yesterday.
Significant funds
The New York Law Journal reported that Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that the firm’s challenge must fail, as there are many rules forbidding non-lawyer investment but the firm only attacked one.
According to the New York court papers seen by Bloomberg, the three potential investors have pledged ‘significant funds’ to devote to Jacoby & Meyers in return for an owning interest. The papers do not identify the occupations of the three investors, nor does it mention ESBS, which has a market value of around $7.9 million.
External investment
That ruling falls against building anticipation across the Atlantic, where the Solicitors Regulation Authority is on the brink of authorising the first legal sector alternative business structures, some of which are likely to involve external investment and non-lawyer ownership.
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]