Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
| 1yr
| 1yr
Historic attitudes favouring globalisation are fundamentally changing....
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
UK-based HSBC agreed yesterday to cough up $1.9 billion after admitting massive failures in its anti-money laundering processes that allowed nearly $900m of Mexican drugs money to be rinsed through its accounts. The bank was also slapped for sanctions busting, as it gave the green light to several deals with barred countries such as Libya, Burma, Sudan and Cuba.
Eye-watering fine
But despite the flagrant breaches of US law and the eye-watering fine, executives at Europe’s biggest bank appear to be off the hook in terms of a possible criminal trial. According to the New York Law Journal, the bank has cut a five-year deferred prosecution agreement with the US Justice Department and a similar two-year deal with the Manhattan District Attorney’s office
Eastern District US Attorney Loretta Lynch defended the decision not to prosecute while speaking to reporters yesterday. According to the Journal, she maintained that a strong factor in the decision was HSBC’s decision to co-operate ‘immediately and extensively’ with the authorities.
Systemic harm
She was joined by Lanny Breuer, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s criminal division, who, according to the Journal, told reporters that the ‘goal is not to bring HSBC down’. He went on to say that the federal authorities wanted to avoid job losses at the bank and ‘systemic’ harm to the economy.
Nonetheless, Mr Breuer appeared to leave the door ajar over the question of whether individual bank executives might still face criminal charges. As to the possibility, he commented elliptically: ‘There may be, but there may not be.’
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]