Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]
Top Irish judges accused of undermining democracy
The Irish Supreme Court has trespassed into the area of law-making, according to a book published this month by a well-known Dublin solicitor.
Michael Williams, author of 'Serving the People?', questions Irish Supreme Court law-making Gabriela Insuratelu
Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
In 'Serving the People?', solicitor-turned-mediator Michael Williams analyses five recent Supreme Court decisions, finds them deeply flawed and concludes that the judges have been 'breaking down the boundary that separates them from lawmakers, and occupying territory where they are trespassers'. Williams, who spent 30 years as a solicitor, states: 'if ultimate political power is vested in the Supreme Court, then Ireland is no longer a democracy'. He then toys with what would be the right name for such a state - an oligarchy of judges or the more obscure term of 'kritarchy'. 'This may seem extreme, but I think it is the effect of the Damache decision,' he adds.
Brilliant advocates
In a wide-ranging book - which also covers the pay of lawyers and judges, the litigation system and recent attempts at reform - he also concludes: ' "Brilliant" advocates who become judges have, in my view, almost always been poor ones'.
