Sign up for our free daily newsletter
YOUR PRIVACY - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY DATA PROTECTION STATEMENT
Below we explain how we will communicate with you. We set out how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.
Global City Media, and its associated brands will use the lawful basis of legitimate interests to use
the
contact details you have supplied to contact you regarding our publications, events, training,
reader
research, and other relevant information. We will always give you the option to opt out of our
marketing.
By clicking submit, you confirm that you understand and accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
It was distributed just two days after Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California expanded the class-action suit that threatens the employment status of drivers.
‘Illegal attempt’
Shannon Liss-Riordan, who represents drivers in the O'Connor v. Uber litigation, filed an emergency motion to block enforcement of Uber's new agreement late last Friday. She wrote in an email to The Recorder: ‘We believe this is an illegal attempt by Uber to usurp the court's role in overseeing the process of who is included in the class.’
No class action for new drivers
A spokesman for Uber said the company does not intend to enforce the arbitration agreement for drivers who are already part of a certified class, including the O'Connor class. But if the agreement is upheld, Uber could use it to prevent new drivers from joining the O'Connor class. Source: The Recorder
Email your news and story ideas to: [email protected]